Week 9 Studio: Failure as material
Choosing a place for the instrument to fail on purpose, and defending that choice against "isn't that just a bug"
19 April 2027
Before the studio#
Bring a list of two things: one place your instrument currently breaks by accident, and (if you don’t have one yet) an idea for a place it could break on purpose instead.
In the studio#
Every instrument built so far has been debugged toward reliability. Today, choose exactly one failure and keep it: a stroke that occasionally refuses to obey the constraint, a decay that overshoots, a seed that produces one malformed result in a hundred. The hard part isn’t writing the failure, it’s the two-sentence defence: what is a viewer meant to feel when it happens, and why is that better than the instrument simply working. If you can’t answer that, it’s still a bug — fix it instead.
Afterwards#
Show the chosen failure to someone without telling them it’s deliberate first. If they report it to you as a bug, your defence from the studio needs another pass before the exhibition.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you can point to one specific place where your instrument fails, breaks a rule, or degrades on purpose
- you can say what that failure is doing for the piece, and how it differs from an actual bug you've also found this semester
Teaching team
- Idris Fenn — tutor