Skip to main content

Week 9 Studio: Failure as material

Choosing a place for the instrument to fail on purpose, and defending that choice against "isn't that just a bug"

19 April 2027

Before the studio

Bring a list of two things: one place your instrument currently breaks by accident, and (if you don’t have one yet) an idea for a place it could break on purpose instead.

In the studio

Every instrument built so far has been debugged toward reliability. Today, choose exactly one failure and keep it: a stroke that occasionally refuses to obey the constraint, a decay that overshoots, a seed that produces one malformed result in a hundred. The hard part isn’t writing the failure, it’s the two-sentence defence: what is a viewer meant to feel when it happens, and why is that better than the instrument simply working. If you can’t answer that, it’s still a bug — fix it instead.

Afterwards

Show the chosen failure to someone without telling them it’s deliberate first. If they report it to you as a bug, your defence from the studio needs another pass before the exhibition.

The spec

What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.

Teaching team