Week 2 Studio: Reading affordances
A studio on affordances and signifiers — why some doors explain themselves and most don't
1 March 2027
Before the session#
Walk one corridor you don’t normally use and note every door in it. You don’t need to judge them yet — just collect them.
In the session#
The studio works in pairs, swapping shortlists and testing whether a description of a door someone else wrote is enough to predict what it will do. It usually isn’t, and the gap between “here’s a door” and “here’s how to use it” is this week’s actual subject. We build the vocabulary the audit will need: affordance, signifier, mapping, feedback, and where a door’s hardware lies about which of these it’s offering.
Afterwards#
Nothing submitted. What leaves is a bigger, more deliberately varied shortlist, ready to be narrowed into the ten the audit needs.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you can distinguish, for a given door, what it affords from what it signifies
- you have found one door on campus that signifies the wrong action
- your shortlist from week 1 has grown to at least six candidate doors
Teaching team
- Petra Voss — convenor