Skip to main content

Week 8 Session: Who pays

Working through three fictional strike scenarios to determine who plausibly pays, and on what basis.

12 April 2027

Before the session

Read the three fictional cases (A, B and C) and the property-damage / personal-injury table in this week’s lecture.

In the session — “The Invoice Allocation Hearing”

StepTimeActivity
15 minRecap the NSW s45 actual-knowledge standard and the property/injury table as a group.
210 minSmall groups are each assigned one case (A, B or C) and determine who plausibly pays, citing the specific clause, scheme or legal standard that applies.
310 minEach group presents its reasoning to a group that worked a different case.
410 minCross-examine: the listening group asks what additional evidence would change the presenting group’s answer.
510 minCases are reassigned with the new complication raised in cross-examination added; groups re-answer quickly.
65 minWrite the Invoice Allocation Memo (see below).

Invoice Allocation Memo (formative, not a final-project attachment)

One paragraph per case (A, B, C): who plausibly pays, the specific basis (clause, scheme, or standard), and your confidence in that answer given what evidence exists. This is a formative output for this week’s activity only.

Afterwards

Keep your notes on what evidence each case actually turned on — that distinction between what happened and what could be proven to have happened is exactly what Week 9’s reporting-obligations material builds on.

Reminder: Assignment 1 (literature review and hotspot analysis, 40% of the unit, marked against two weighted criteria) is due today at 12:00, 2027-04-12. This session doesn’t change that deadline or add anything to its spec.

The spec

What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.

Teaching team