Skip to main content

Week 3: Mapping numbers to sound

Design and compare mappings across pitch, loudness, timbre, time and stereo position.

Week 03 · Mapping

9 August 2027

When does a sonic mapping preserve an order, difference or pattern in the data?

Data object
normalized scalar sequence
Lecture deckOpen the taught visual narrative

The question

“Higher value, higher note” is only one design. We compare linear and logarithmic scales, continuous and discrete pitch, loudness limits, stereo position and tempo. The test is not whether a result sounds pleasant, but whether its perceptual ordering matches the intended data relationship.

Signal chain

Scalar values → choose data domain → choose auditory range → define scale → listen for discriminability → publish the rule. A mapping legend must let another person reconstruct the operation without hearing the artefact.

The lab uses the same sequence for three mappings, creating a controlled comparison rather than three unrelated compositions.

Observation guide 03

Mapping

Use this page before the slides, then return to the checkpoint after the lab.

  1. Match data relationships to perceptually distinguishable sound dimensions.
  2. Compare linear, logarithmic and quantised scales with the same values.
  3. Select a mapping from listening evidence rather than musical preference.
normalised value
A synthetic scalar sequence with one small and one large increase. Values are a teaching model, not an astronomical observation.

Test the scale, not the melody

A synthetic scalar sequence with one small and one large increase.

  1. Render the values with a linear 220 to 660 Hz mapping.
  2. Render them again after logarithmic scaling.
  3. Quantise a third version to five pitches while keeping duration fixed.
  4. Ask listeners to locate the two largest changes without seeing the plot.

What the method supportsThe best mapping depends on the comparison task. Quantisation may clarify categories while erasing small differences; a logarithmic scale may expand low values and compress high ones.

If a listener can rank all values but cannot judge their differences, which data relationship did the mapping preserve?Reveal the reasoning

It preserved ordinal order, not interval size.

A ranking task only requires higher and lower to remain ordered. Claims about twice as much or equal differences require a mapping whose perceptual intervals support that stronger relationship.

The Sonification Handbook by COST and Logos Publishing House

Use the chapters on parameter-mapping sonification and auditory perception as the conceptual reference.

The mapping matrix becomes the decision record for the Listening Notebook.

Teaching team