Skip to main content

Week 8: Objectives

Dragons, Heralds and towers are only good decisions when the team can convert what they grant — so the question is never whether to take an objective, but what happens next if you do. Builds on tempo (Week 6) and vision (Week 7) to treat objective calls as an extension of both.

12 April 2027

Guiding question

When is taking Dragon the wrong decision?

An objective existing is not a reason to take it

Dragon spawning, Herald being up, a tower being low — none of these are instructions. Each is an opportunity a team can spend tempo contesting, and like any other tempo spend (Week 6), it only pays off if what follows is worth more than what it cost.

The vocabulary

Builds on Weeks 3, 5, 6 and 7 together

Whether an objective can be safely contested depends on wave states elsewhere on the map (Week 3 — can everyone actually leave their lane?), where the enemy jungler plausibly is (Week 5), whether there’s tempo to spend getting there and converting afterward (Week 6), and how confident that whole read is (Week 7). Nothing here is a new mechanical concept; it’s where the previous four weeks’ tools get used on a single call at once.

An uncomfortable scenario

Dragon spawns in 20 seconds. Your team’s situation:

Choose one, and be specific about what it buys and what it costs:

  1. Contest anyway — buys a chance at the objective now; costs a fight taken outnumbered, on no information, with a teammate who can’t help.
  2. Concede outright — costs the buff and the gold entirely; buys nothing back, but avoids the fight and the wave loss both.
  3. Trade — let the objective go, and instead let the pushing bot wave crash for free minions and tower plates, timed with the recalling player’s return.
  4. Threaten without taking — show up at the pit to deny an easy, uncontested take, without actually committing to the fight; costs nothing but the travel time, buys denial rather than possession.

There’s no single correct answer graded here. What matters is that the buy/cost pair named for the chosen option is accurate and complete — this is the strongest demonstration in the course so far that League decisions resist absolute rules.

Teaching team