Week 04 · Due 19 March 2027 · Assessment

Role Teardown and Gap Map

Dossier sections one to four: an evidenced baseline inventory, three real target ads, one four-column annotated teardown, and a gap map tiered by closeability.

Worth 20% of the course

Four weeks in, you hand over the first third of your Dossier and find out whether the floor you set in week 1 held once somebody else read it.

The facts

  • Submit Dossier §§1–4 as one PDF or one shared document, through the course submission point.
  • Due Friday 19 March 2027, 5:00 pm (end of week 4).
  • Worth 20% of the course.
  • Marked against the four weighted criteria at the foot of this page.

What goes in

Four numbered sections, in this order.

  1. Baseline Inventory (§1). Every claim you currently make about yourself, each one paired with the evidence you could put in front of a stranger inside ninety seconds. Claims with no evidence stay in, marked as such. An inventory with nothing unevidenced in it is not an honest inventory, it is a second CV.
  2. Three target advertisements (§2). Real, current, and for roles you would actually take. Screenshot or full text, with the source and the date you captured it.
  3. Annotated teardown (§3). One of those three ads, pulled apart into the four columns from week 2: legal boilerplate, the wishlist nobody expects met, the work you would actually do on a Tuesday, and the accidental confession about what went wrong in the last hire. Every line of the ad lands in exactly one column, and you say why.
  4. Gap Map (§4). Every distance between the baseline and the target, each tiered: closeable by week 12, closeable in a year, or not closeable and therefore something you will say out loud in the room.

Where it comes from

Nothing here is written the night before. §1 and §2 come out of the week-1 self-audit clinic, §3 out of the week-2 teardown, §4 out of the week-3 blind review, and the week-4 claims tribunal is your last chance to have peers strike an unevidenced claim before a marker does it for you.

What separates a strong submission

The teardown is where most of the accuracy marks sit, and the gap map is where most of the marks sit full stop — 40 of them. A gap map that says “I need more experience” earns very little. A gap map that says “I have never deployed anything other people depended on, which is tier two, and here is the specific thing I am doing about it by week 12” earns most of the 40. The specific version is harder to write and easier to respect.

Legibility is only worth 10, but it is the 10 you lose by accident. Someone who has never met you reads this document without you narrating it. Number your sections. Label your columns. Date your evidence.

If you are behind

Talk to Margot Tse before the due date rather than after it. Extensions, special consideration and the late penalty are all set out on the policies page, and none of them are worse than silence.

Next in the ladder: A2 — Performance Materials, which is fitted to whichever target you tear down here.

The spec

What a marker checks

The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part — some lines can be checked mechanically, the rest call for judgement.

  • every claim in the baseline inventory points at evidence you could produce in ninety seconds
  • the teardown separates boilerplate, wishlist, actual work and accidental confession
  • each gap is tiered, specific, and stated without apology or bluff

How it is marked

4 weighted criteria

30%Accuracy of the teardown — does the four-column split hold up against the ad
40%Specificity of gap articulation — planned against, not apologised for
20%Evidence behind every baseline claim
10%Legibility of the Dossier as a working document someone else could read

Sums to 100%.