Skip to main content

A5

The four-sentence video ladder plus a counter-example, submitted as five clips with a diagnosis of what the counter-example got wrong.

Week 5 · Due 26 March 2027 · 3%

Four sentences, said plainly, then said as a fight.

What to do

Build the ladder from this week’s exercise for one action: one line, subject and action, the full four sentences, then the four sentences with a beat and a negative prompt added. Then generate the counter-example on purpose — the same four sentences put under demands that contradict each other — so there’s a deliberately bad take to read alongside the good ones.

What to submit

All five clips in ladder order with the counter-example marked, the four sentences used for each, and a seed and parameter log for the set. Alongside the clips, name which of the four sentences the counter-example was actually fighting itself on.

How it’s assessed

Sentence grammar checks whether each tier’s clip actually matches its own subject, shot size, camera movement, and light, in that order of priority. Counter-example diagnosis checks whether the named contradiction is the real cause of the failure, not a guess dressed up as an explanation. Log quality checks that the log reproduces any one clip in the set without further explanation.

How it is marked

CriterionWeight
Sentence grammar40%
Counter-example diagnosis30%
Log quality30%