A5
The four-sentence video ladder plus a counter-example, submitted as five clips with a diagnosis of what the counter-example got wrong.
Week 5 · Due 26 March 2027 · 3%
Four sentences, said plainly, then said as a fight.
What to do#
Build the ladder from this week’s exercise for one action: one line, subject and action, the full four sentences, then the four sentences with a beat and a negative prompt added. Then generate the counter-example on purpose — the same four sentences put under demands that contradict each other — so there’s a deliberately bad take to read alongside the good ones.
What to submit#
All five clips in ladder order with the counter-example marked, the four sentences used for each, and a seed and parameter log for the set. Alongside the clips, name which of the four sentences the counter-example was actually fighting itself on.
How it’s assessed#
Sentence grammar checks whether each tier’s clip actually matches its own subject, shot size, camera movement, and light, in that order of priority. Counter-example diagnosis checks whether the named contradiction is the real cause of the failure, not a guess dressed up as an explanation. Log quality checks that the log reproduces any one clip in the set without further explanation.
How it is marked
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Sentence grammar | 40% |
| Counter-example diagnosis | 30% |
| Log quality | 30% |