Week 2 Studio: Reading the needle
A hands-on comparison of gauge placement and priority across three real dashboards
1 March 2027
Before the studio#
Find, or photograph, the instrument cluster of at least three cars from different categories — for example a performance car, a family car, and a commercial or fleet vehicle. Bring images or just the make and model so the group can look them up together; a photographed owner’s-manual page works as well as a photo of the dashboard itself.
In the studio#
Working in pairs, lay the three clusters side by side and answer the same question of each one: which instrument is centred and largest, and what does that position claim about what its driver needs fastest? Pairs then swap findings across the room and argue two specific cases: does the layout match how the car is actually likely to be driven, and would a first-time driver of that exact car be able to read its “normal” zone without ever having driven it before — or only its printed danger zone?
Afterwards#
Write the comparison up as an argument, not a description: pick two of the three clusters and defend which layout serves its driver better, and why. This feeds directly into next week, where the same question gets asked of a dashboard that has no zones left to read at all — only a light.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- Bring driver's-eye photographs or manuals of at least three different cars' instrument clusters, from different categories of car.
- For each cluster, identify the centred, largest instrument and state, in one sentence, what its placement claims matters most to the driver.
- Produce a short written argument (150+ words) comparing at least two of the layouts and defending which driver each layout best serves.
Teaching team
- Idris Fenn — tutor