Skip to main content

Week 3: Reading the Tail

How language, repetition, routine and shared history give a signal meaning, without mistaking interpretation for certainty

8 March 2027

Open the slides

A signal has no meaning on its own

“Reading the tail” borrows its name from an actual cat’s tail: low and swishing can mean irritation, or focus, or play, depending on everything around it — the ears, the context, what happened five minutes ago. Read it alone and you will guess wrong at least as often as you guess right. This course is not, however, a course in animal behaviour, and you are not going to spend this lecture on tails or ears. The problem you actually face is the same shape, aimed at something you can act on directly: your human cat’s own words carry no fixed meaning apart from everything around them either.

Take a human cat who texts you “I’m fine.” From a human cat who says it every Tuesday after a hard shift, it usually means “don’t push, just stay nearby.” From the same human cat the first time they have ever said it, or from a different human cat entirely, “I’m fine” might mean exactly what it says — or the opposite. The words are identical; the signal is not, because the signal was never just the words. It was the words plus everything you already know about this particular human cat, at this particular point in your relationship with them.

What gives a signal meaning

None of this makes interpretation certain. It makes it informed — a guess grounded in something more than the words on their own, which is a different thing from a guess dressed up as a fact.

Interpretation is not certainty

Reading your human cat well does not mean you stop being wrong. It means your wrongness becomes visible and correctable, because you can point to what you read the signal against and revisit it when it turns out to be wrong. An interpretation you can name your reasons for is one you can revise. An interpretation you cannot is already halfway to being an assumption.

Outline

Teaching team