Skip to main content

Week 6: Swing Trading

Swing trading as a case study in multi-day exposure — overnight gaps, event risk and capital tied up across days — built on Weeks 4–5

29 March 2027

View Slides

Swing trading is the course’s first case study in multi-day exposure: a position held over days or weeks sits through market closes it can’t react to, meaning overnight gaps and scheduled events can move price before a stop even gets the chance to trigger at the level it was set. It leans directly on Week 4’s chart vocabulary and Week 5’s risk toolkit — a moving average here is introduced as a lagging summary of trend, not a standalone buy or sell signal — and every worked example pairs an entry idea with the stop and position size Week 5 already covered.

The question this week answers

A position held overnight is exposed to prices the account never got to react to. What does a complete swing trade plan look like once that exposure, Week 4’s chart vocabulary and Week 5’s risk toolkit are combined?

By the end of this lecture

Key ideas

Swing trading holds positions from a few days to a few weeks — long enough that intraday noise from Week 7 matters less, short enough that Week 3’s investing-style patience doesn’t apply either. Every one of those overnight closes is capital tied up and exposed while the market isn’t open: a stop set at $45 assumes the next available price is near $45, but a gap caused by news released after the close can open well below it, and the stop fills at whatever price is available next, not the price it was set at.

A moving average, introduced in Week 4’s arithmetic, is a lagging summary: because it’s an average of past closes, it only reflects a change in trend after that change has already been underway. This course treats it as one input for describing trend, not a trigger that says “buy” or “sell” on its own — the strategy structure below is what actually turns an observation into a plan.

Every swing setup in this course is described with Week 5’s six parts: observation, assumption, entry, invalidation, risk, exit. Skipping any one of them is treated as an incomplete plan, not a shortcut.

A worked example

A simulated watchlist entry, “Fernbridge Retail”:

The numbers

Applying Week 5’s position-sizing formula to this setup, for a $10,000 account risking 1%:

10,000 × 0.01 = $100 risk budget

Stop distance is entry minus invalidation: 48 − 45 = $3.

100 ÷ 3 = 33.3 → 33 shares

If the target of $54 is reached: reward per share is 54 − 48 = $6, so total reward is 33 × 6 = $198 against 33 × 3 = $99 risked — an R-multiple (reward divided by risk) of roughly 2:1. The R-multiple doesn’t say the trade will work; it says what’s being risked relative to what’s being sought if it does.

What a diagram would show

A concept diagram overlaying the four plan stages — entry, invalidation, risk, target — directly onto a simulated candlestick chart with a moving average line, so the abstract observation/assumption/entry/invalidation/ risk/exit structure and the actual price levels sit in one picture.

Try it yourself

The takeaway

A moving average describes a trend that has already been forming — it doesn’t call a turn in advance. What makes a swing trade a plan rather than a guess is the full structure around it: a stated invalidation and a size set by Week 5’s method, not the indicator alone. None of that structure removes the multi-day exposure itself — a gap can still fill a stop somewhere other than where it was set — which is exactly the risk Week 7’s shorter holding period is built to avoid. Week 7 keeps this same structure and compresses the holding period down to hours.

Teaching team