Week 10 Tute: Cultural variation
Week 10, testing the semester's assumptions against a culture that isn't the classroom's default
3 May 2027
Everything up to this point has mostly been observed from inside one cultural default. Civil inattention, proxemics zones and third-place criteria all vary by culture, sometimes a little, sometimes enough to make last week’s “obvious” reading of a room wrong somewhere else.
Before the session#
Pick one norm or framework from an earlier week and find a specific example (from your own background, someone else’s, or reliable reading) of a culture where it works differently. Come with the example, not just the claim that “it’s probably different somewhere.”
In the session#
We compare cases and locate this course against the Australian Curriculum’s personal and social capability framework, which names much of this territory already at a school level. This course’s difference is that it stays hands-on and field-based rather than staying at the level of a general capability statement.
Afterwards#
Keep this comparison in mind for the final assessment: a redesign that only works for one cultural context is a narrower one than it looks.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you can name one coexistence norm from this semester that is not universal across cultures, with a specific example
- you have compared an assumption from an earlier week against at least one other cultural context
- you can state where this course's material sits relative to the Australian Curriculum's personal and social capability framework
Teaching team
- Idris Fenn, tutor