Week 1 Problem Session: Getting started
The first Problem Session — no assignment is due yet, so it's spent agreeing on notation and working the week 1 example by hand together
22 February 2027
Before the session#
Read the week 1 lecture. Bring one folk poker claim of your own — something you’ve heard said with confidence at a table or in a strategy forum — that isn’t already on the list the lecture names.
In the session#
No problem set is due in week 1, so the time goes to notation and a shared worked example instead. Hand notation, range notation, and the equity/EV vocabulary introduced in lecture get fixed here, once, so that nobody spends week 4 unsure whether “equity” means the same thing two people mean by it.
Then the group re-derives the week 1 example — 22’s equity against a random hand — by hand, in miniature: not a full 300,000-trial simulation with pen and paper, but enough of a reduced version (a handful of representative opponent hands, a handful of representative boards) to see why a computed number, not a table thumb-rule, is the kind of answer this course is after.
The folk claims brought in from outside get sorted onto the same list the lecture started: which ones the semester’s syllabus will actually resolve, and which ones don’t have an obvious formal claim hiding inside them at all — which is itself a useful thing to notice about a piece of folklore.
Afterwards#
Nothing is marked this week. What should be settled going into week 2: shared notation, and a working sense of what turns an assertion into a computation.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you can state, in your own words, what makes a claim "formalized" under this course's definition
- you have re-derived the week 1 worked example's equity figure by hand, not just read it
Teaching team
- Renata Sokal — convenor