Week 4 Workshop: Autopsy method clinic
A working session on how to take a coincidence apart properly, before the Meaning Autopsy asks you to do it in writing, unsupervised.
Field session
16 August 2027
Taking a coincidence apart is a specific skill, and it’s easy to do it badly in two opposite directions: explaining it away too fast (“obviously confirmation bias”) without engaging what actually made it feel striking, or taking it too seriously without ever checking the boring explanation first. This workshop is a rehearsal for the Meaning Autopsy, using material you’ve already collected.
Before the workshop#
Bring the strongest candidate from your Pattern Diary so far — the entry you’d be most tempted to call “too weird to be a coincidence.”
In the workshop#
Small groups take turns presenting one diary entry each and applying a short checklist: what was noticed, what it was linked to, whether the link survived contact with what actually happened, and which of the frameworks from weeks 1 to 4 best explains the noticing itself. The group’s job is to push on the weakest point in each other’s account, not to agree with it.
Afterwards#
Choose which entry you’ll autopsy properly and start reading around the framework you’ll need — dream theory, probability, or the omen-reading pattern from week 3 are all fair game depending on what you picked.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you bring one candidate coincidence or dream from your own diary
- you can state, in one sentence, why it initially felt meaningful
- you leave with a short plan for which course framework you'll apply to it
Teaching team
- Dr Wren Castellan — convenor