Case 09 — The office file
Reviewing a sample workplace document for workslop indicators without assuming bad faith on the part of whoever wrote it
19 April 2027
Every document in this session is fictional, and every one of them is modelled on a completely ordinary piece of office writing — a status update, a one-pager, a meeting summary — because workslop’s whole trick is that it never looks extraordinary.
Before the session#
Nothing to prepare. Bring whatever patience you have left for reading plausible-sounding paragraphs that go nowhere; you’ll need it.
In the session#
Read three short fictional workplace documents and, for each, decide: does this actually advance the task, or does it just look like it does? Then write one sentence of feedback you could actually send to the (fictional) author without accusing them of anything you can’t support.
Afterwards#
The skill this session is really testing is restraint — naming a real problem with the artefact while staying scrupulously fair to the person who produced it. You’ll need both halves of that in any real workplace, this course’s casework included.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you have reviewed a sample workplace document for workslop indicators without assuming bad faith on the part of its author
- you can separate "this document doesn't do the job" from "this person is lazy or dishonest"
Teaching team
- Elena Kowalczyk — tutor