Bring the week 8 deck’s worked example fresh in mind — this session repeats
the exercise on a fresh table you haven’t seen. Deciding who does the
dishes afterwards is, once again, not covered.
Working in pairs, run the algorithm by hand: propose, hold, reject, repeat,
until every match is final. Then swap which side proposes and re-run on the
same preferences. Compare the two outcomes.
If the two runs gave different matches — they usually do — you’ve just
demonstrated the proposer-optimal / receiver-optimal asymmetry yourself,
which sets up week 9’s question directly: stability was never the whole
story.