Week 5 Lab: Source Critique Lab
Apply Monday's read-the-source-against-its-interest test to a sustainability claim on your own week 1 package
22 March 2027
Before the lab#
Bring back your week 1 package, and look for any sustainability-adjacent text or symbol on it before the lab starts: a recycling triangle, a material code, a certification mark, a line of marketing copy about the environment.
In the lab#
- Find the claim — if your package has no such claim, borrow a classmate’s, or use whichever week 1 case (Apple, lululemon, OnTheList) is closest to something you’ve seen elsewhere.
- Find the publisher — is the claim made by the brand itself, a third-party certifier, an industry body, or a government scheme? Look it up if you don’t already know.
- Apply the test — using Monday’s Fibre Box Association example as a template, separate two questions: is the underlying methodology or standard sound, and does the publisher have a direct interest in you believing the comparison it implies? A claim can pass one test and fail the other.
- Name the gap — write one sentence on what information you’d need (an independent audit, a competing material’s own LCA, the raw study itself) to actually check the claim rather than just trust or distrust it on reputation.
Afterwards#
Keep your claim and your one-sentence gap. Week 6 asks you to place your week 1 case study’s sustainability posture, if it has one, against the other four logics you now have numbers for.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you have found one sustainability claim printed on your week 1 package (a recyclability symbol, a "sustainably sourced" line, a certification logo) and named who published or certified it
- you can state what that publisher gains if the claim is believed, and whether that changes how you read the claim
- you have written one sentence stating what specific additional information would let you check the claim independently
Teaching team
- Idris Fenn — tutor