The room's first voted pick. Booking a fixed slot for worrying, postponing everything into it, and finding out whether a loop will actually wait.
26 April 2027
This is the first of the crits the cohort chose. It came out of the vote on the anonymous thread, where some version of “I make myself deal with it later” turned up more often than anything else. What follows is the plan as it stands. If the vote reshuffles the back half again, this is the kind of thing that moves.
Before the session#
Book yourself a worry appointment for this week. Fifteen minutes, a specific time, somewhere you can sit. Put it in whatever you actually look at.
Then, between now and the crit, try the move. When you notice a worry starting, write down one line about it and tell yourself you will do it properly at the appointment. Go back to whatever you were doing. At the appointment, open the list.
Nothing about this has to work. Turning up having failed at it is a result, and a more interesting one than turning up having succeeded.
In the session#
Round one, the log. What did you postpone, how many times did the same thing come back before the slot, and what actually happened when you sat down with it. The most common report is that some of the list had evaporated and the rest took four minutes. If that is not what happened to you, say so, because that is the finding the room needs.
You can pass on this round without giving a reason, and you can describe a worry in the vaguest terms you like. “One about money” is a complete entry.
Round two, the mechanism. Worry postponement asks you to believe two things. That the loop will still be there later, and that later you will be able to get through it. Which of those did your week actually support? A loop that dissolves by the appointment was arguably never going to resolve. A loop that is still burning at the appointment is a different animal, and worth naming as one.
Round three, in pairs. Design the version you would actually keep doing. When, where, how long, and what you do with the list at the end.
Where the evidence sits#
Borkovec, Wilkinson, Folensbee and Lerman (1983, Behaviour Research and Therapy) borrowed this from insomnia treatment, where you get out of bed rather than lie there failing to sleep. Their reasoning was that worry happens anywhere because it has been paired with everywhere, so confining it to one time and place might weaken the pairing. Two experiments with self-identified worriers showed real reductions in daily worry against no treatment.
One honest wrinkle. Their instructions also told people to problem-solve and to return attention to the present, so the effect cannot be pinned on the postponing alone. That is worth knowing before you credit the appointment for everything.
Dippel, Brosschot and Verkuil (2024, International Journal of Cognitive Therapy) pooled seven randomised trials and 999 people. Worry postponement beat simply recording your worries, with d = 0.313 for how long people worried and d = 0.189 for how often. Both small. The authors also note there is no long-term follow-up, so nobody knows whether this holds past a month.
So it works, a bit, for a few weeks, and nobody has checked what happens after that. This course would rather tell you that than sell you a habit.
Afterwards#
Log it, including if it did nothing. A technique that failed on you is more useful to the room than another person confirming it works.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you have postponed at least one real worry into a booked slot and can say what happened when you got there
- you can say what worry postponement asks you to believe about a loop, and whether your own week supported it
Teaching team
- Idris Fenn, tutor
