Skip to main content

Week 5 Lab: Repair Drills

Planted misunderstandings to practise specific repair initiators, then low-stakes apologies built from the template, with a partner checking which parts arrived.

Lab, 25 March 2027

Tuesday gave you three repair initiators and an apology template. Today you practise both with a partner who checks what they heard.

Before the lab

Nothing to prepare. The template is on the lecture page; bring it on a screen. You can run the same rounds by passing written lines at the edge of the room. An acceptance is one written or spoken turn; the role counts stay the same.

Run sheet

Times below run from the 14:05 start; finish at 14:55.

TimeWhat happens
0:00–0:06Pairs. Read the card instructions below and demonstrate one repair.
0:06–0:22Repair round. Run the six cards twice: first A sends all six and B repairs, then swap. The sender supplies the missing information after the most specific available initiator; the listener accepts in one turn. Mark initiator type, not whether it was the tutor’s favourite.
0:22–0:27Compare one specific and one less specific repair. What information was available when the listener chose? If all were specific, explain what made that possible.
0:27–0:43Apology round. Two each, using the two scenarios below. The partner ticks the template parts they heard, then responds in one turn. “Thanks, I need time” is allowed. Use the second attempt to include any missing part.
0:43–0:50Pool the missing-part tally. Each person writes one part to watch for in a real exchange, and a possible second instance for Sunday’s journal.

Repair cards

The sender reads the line, keeping the intended detail hidden until asked. Both partners may know the bank; this is practice choosing an initiator.

Spoken lineDetail for the sender to supply
“Meet you Thursday.”Thursday next week
“Send it to the other address.”the course email, not the group chat
“Put it beside that one.”beside the blue notebook
“We start at two.”two in the afternoon
“Bring the earlier version.”the draft dated Monday
“Ask the tutor after the thing.”after the lecture

Apology scenarios

Both partners practise both fictional cases:

Use the lecture’s seven-row template. The receiver checks for the parts, not for a performance of remorse. A brief explanation is allowed after ownership; it does not erase what the other person had to do.

A note on the apology round

The scenarios are trivial on purpose. Nobody practises an apology for something they’re actually sorry about in a lab. The point is the structure, not the feeling, so that on the day you need it, the parts are already there.

If building an apology from parts feels mechanical: it is, for now. Week 1’s handshake felt mechanical too, written down. The parts are what the unmechanical version is made of.

What leaves the room

A tally of your repair initiators, and a note of any apology parts you left out. Choose one part to test in Sunday’s journal.

What you leave the lab with

Check these before you leave the lab.

Teaching team