Weekly viewing responses
Short reactions to each week's drama and its questions, submitted across the semester rather than all at once
Due: 14 May 2027 · Weight: 20%
The brief#
Watch, react, and say something specific — not everything, just the one thing this week’s drama actually made you think about.
Twelve weeks is a lot of television and a lot of territory — food, politics, family, gender, work, education, history, memory, class, appearance, and service. The weekly response is where you keep pace with that, one short reaction at a time, rather than saving all your thinking for two big essays.
A strong response picks one of the week’s questions and pushes on it: a claim, a piece of evidence from the episode, and a sentence on what it would mean if you’re right. A plot summary with a comment tacked on the end is not a response.
What you submit#
A short written response (150–300 words) for most weeks of the semester, submitted by the end of that teaching week. Aim for coverage across the semester rather than a perfect run — an occasional missed week costs less than twelve rushed ones.
How it’s marked#
Two criteria: whether each response actually engages with that week’s questions, and whether engagement holds up across the semester rather than front-loading effort into the first few weeks and coasting after.
The spec
The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.
- a short response is submitted for most weeks, in the format named below
- each response engages with that week's questions specifically, not just a plot summary
- the responses read as your own reaction, not a restatement of the lecture
How it is marked
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Engagement with the week's questions | 60% |
| Consistency across the semester | 40% |