Skip to main content

The Critique Portfolio

Six notes across six domains, plus an honest account of where the method held and where it didn't.

Due: 17 May 2027 · Weight: 50%

The brief

Prove, with evidence rather than assertion, whether one method for giving feedback actually survives six unrelated domains.

By week 11 you’ll have written notes on visual work, code, prose, a blind proposal, a published-style review, and a brief. The Final Project collects the strongest of each into a portfolio, and asks you to argue — using the notes themselves as evidence — whether “specific, falsifiable, about the work” is a real method or a description that happened to fit this semester’s assignments.

The scope that fits twelve weeks is six short notes and a two-page argument, not a rewrite of any of them into something longer. The work was already done, week by week; this is the case for what it adds up to.

What you submit

One document: the six notes, each with the piece of work it was about named or linked, and a two-page argument that uses the notes as evidence for or against the semester’s claim — including, explicitly, your weakest note and what it shows.

The spec

The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.

How it is marked

Marked as a whole against the semester's own claim, that a note built from three properties --- specific, falsifiable, about the work --- holds up across unrelated domains. A portfolio that shows the method working smoothly every time is weaker evidence for that claim than one that names the domain it strained in and says why. The strongest portfolios read as an argument, not a collection.