Skip to main content

Week 7 of 12 — Phase III, Assemble and Transport

Thermal Conflict

How does temperature change one assembly's behaviour over time?

Commencing12 April 2027ArtefactThermal Comparison

Test station 07

The apparatus.

Thermal timelineRead the same specimen at three times. Nothing is animated between them.
Outer layerWarm zoneOuter layerREADING 1 — 0 minDiscrete readings — no continuous record exists
Reading 01 — 0 minWarm throughout. The interface is dry and the outer layer is at its stiffest.
Outer layerWarm zoneOuter layerREADING 2 — 20 minDiscrete readings — no continuous record exists
Reading 02 — 20 minA gradient has formed. Condensation has appeared at the cooling boundary — moisture the specimen brought with it.
Outer layerWarm zoneOuter layerREADING 3 — 40 minDiscrete readings — no continuous record exists
Reading 03 — 40 minUniform and cool. The condensation has wetted the lower boundary; the thermal event is over and its moisture is not.

This week

Structural question — how does temperature change one assembly’s behaviour over time?

A warm assembly and a cool one are not two designs. They are the same design at two points on a curve. This week measures the curve.

The cooling boundary

Heat moves from the warmer region to the cooler one until the difference is gone. An assembly that leaves the bench warm therefore carries a gradient — warmest at the interior layer that supplied the heat, coolest at the outer surface losing it to the room. There is no single temperature to record, only a temperature and the place it was taken.

The gradient matters because it moves water. Vapour driven out of a warm layer travels outwards, meets a surface below its dew point — usually the inner face of the outer layer, or the inside of a wrapper — and condenses there as liquid. This is moisture arriving at the boundary from inside the assembly, which is a different arrival from the migration Week 4 records, and it is invisible from outside.

Time then does the rest. The gradient collapses within minutes; the liquid it deposited does not leave. A specimen measured at equilibrium reads as unremarkable while carrying the whole thermal history of the twenty minutes before it. The course treats the assembly as three lumped thermal zones rather than a continuous field — a teaching simplification, not a claim about how heat actually distributes.

Investigation

At the thermal timeline station, one specimen condition is observed at three fixed time points: on assembly, at ten minutes, and at twenty. Nothing is observed between them. At each point, record a temperature and the location it was taken from, the condition of the inner face of the outer layer, and where liquid is visible.

Run an ambient control alongside. Without it you cannot separate what temperature did from what twenty minutes would have done anyway.

Failure condition

The inner face of the outer layer is wet while its outer face is still dry. The boundary has been loaded from inside, and the specimen looks intact until it is opened.

What leaves the session

A Thermal Comparison: three timed observations of one condition against an ambient control, each with its measurement location, and a statement of which change you attribute to temperature rather than to elapsed time. The Failure Autopsy reasons from sequences, and this is the first artefact that hands it one with times on it.

Where this week's evidence goes

Diagnose — 25%

Failure Autopsy

Reconstruct the most defensible failure sequence from incomplete evidence.

Due 14 May 2027, end of Week 11

The Thermal Comparison this week produces is evidence for that submission. The recording sheet for it, and the standard it is judged against, are in the Field Manual.

Any activity here can be completed with a physical specimen, a non-food analogue, or the supplied evidence pack — see policies and participation.

Week navigation

SLOP2895 / week 07 / thermal comparison