Week 4 of 12 — Phase II, Expose the Forces
Moisture Is a Load
How does liquid progressively compromise a boundary?
Test station 04
The apparatus.
This week
Structural question — how does liquid progressively compromise a boundary?
Liquid does not soak a layer evenly. It advances as a front with a position, and the position can be marked at a stated time. This week marks it three times.
The advancing front
Capillary action drives the front: surface tension at the pore walls draws liquid inward, and viscosity resists. For idealised uniform pores the distance advanced grows with the square root of elapsed time rather than in proportion to it, so a front that crosses half a layer in five minutes does not cross the remaining half in the next five. Real layers have irregular pores and the relationship is rougher than the idealisation, but the deceleration is dependable enough to schedule an observation around.
Pore size sets the trade. Fine pores pull harder and flow more slowly — high suction, low rate. Coarse pores admit liquid quickly and give it up just as readily. Two layers can reach the same wetted fraction by opposite routes, and the route is what your record needs to show.
The load in the week’s title is not the weight of the liquid. A few grams change nothing the beam reasoning of Week 2 would notice. What changes is stiffness: the wetted region stops carrying tension, and the layer’s effective span shortens to whatever is still dry. Separation then tends to occur at the boundary between wet and dry material, where stiffness changes sharply over a short distance, rather than at the wettest point. That is the counter-intuitive result the week exists to make observable, and it is also the argument of the course’s lecture deck, Moisture Is a Load, which should be read before the laboratory rather than after it.
Investigation
In the translucent moisture laboratory, introduce liquid at one face of a
supported specimen and mark the front position on the acetate overlay at
t=0, t=5 and t=15 minutes. Hold one dry specimen alongside as a control.
At each mark, load the specimen briefly and note deflection against the dry
case.
Three routes produce the same overlay: a physical specimen, a porous non-food analogue of comparable thickness, or the supplied timed photograph set traced by hand. The evidence is the sequence of front positions, not the liquid.
Failure condition
A hinge, tear or separation forms along the wet–dry boundary while the far face is still dry. Record the elapsed time and the front position at the moment it appeared.
What leaves the session
An Absorption Observation: one overlay carrying three dated front positions, the interval between them, the dry control, and a note of where the specimen failed relative to the front. Moisture placement is one of the variables the Component Test accepts as a declared variable, and this overlay is the form its evidence takes.
Where this week's evidence goes
Building towards it.
Isolate — 20%
Component Test
Isolate one structural variable and test it under at least three conditions.
Due 9 April 2027, end of Week 6
The Absorption Observation this week produces is evidence for that submission. The recording sheet for it, and the standard it is judged against, are in the Field Manual.
Any activity here can be completed with a physical specimen, a non-food analogue, or the supplied evidence pack — see policies and participation.