Week 2 Session: Crit: First Review
The second session — the instance you named in week 1 meets a skeptical room for the first time
1 March 2027
Before the session#
Bring the instance from week 1, plus one historical precedent that demonstrates the same underlying dynamic — Chayanov’s peasants, a guild ladder, or an equivalent case predating the term’s viral currency.
In the session#
Short reviews, followed by structured feedback addressing whether the instance constitutes involution proper, rather than ordinary effort. The room retains the right to reclassify your pitch.
Afterwards#
An instance that survives a second round of scrutiny is considered sufficiently robust to carry into Assignment 1.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- the instance named in week 1 demonstrates continued validity under adversarial questioning, not just author confidence
- you can situate one pre-2020 precedent within the same analytic frame
Teaching team
- Aaron Jin — Convenor, Lecturer & Tutor; 卷王 (Involution King)