Opinion

Editorials

A Menace by Any Other Name

This newspaper has said it before and will say it again: the masked figure prowling our skyline is no hero. He is a vigilante, plain and simple, answerable to no one and accountable to nothing but his own vanity. Every week some breathless account crosses my desk praising this "wall-crawler" for a rescue or a collar, and every week I ask the same question nobody in city government seems willing to answer: who does he think he is? A costume and a camera-ready escape do not make a man a hero, they make him a menace this city has been far too eager to applaud.

I am told, by readers and by my own staff, that I am alone in this view. I am not. I am simply the only one willing to print it. A city that cheers a man for operating outside the law is a city one bad night away from cheering the next man who does the same, and the next, until there is no law left standing at all, only capes and masks and the mob's applause. The council's registration ordinance is a start. It is not enough. Until this vigilante stands in the light and gives his name, he remains exactly what I have called him from the start: a menace.

Reader's Opinions

Not every New Yorker shares the publisher's view. Dozens of letters arrived this week, and while a handful echo Mr. Jameson's alarm, the majority strike a different tone entirely.

"He carried my son down six flights of a burning stairwell and vanished before I could even learn his name. I don't care what Mr. Jameson calls him. I call him the reason my boy is alive."

— A mother, Park Slope, Brooklyn

"I was on that stalled 6 train when he pried the doors and helped an elderly man off the tracks. The Bugle can print what it likes. The rest of us were there."

— A commuter, Manhattan

"Vigilante or not, I'd rather have him on my rooftop than three armed men in my bank lobby. Seems a fair trade to me."

— A reader, Queens

"Mr. Jameson is right to be cautious. We don't know this man's face, his training, or his intentions. Good results today don't guarantee good judgment tomorrow."

— A reader, Staten Island

Letters to the Editor

To the Editor:

Your paper's relentless campaign against the wall-crawler would carry more weight if it were matched by equal scrutiny of the criminals he keeps stopping. I have read every issue this month and counted exactly zero editorials on the men who tried to rob Midtown Trust, and a dozen on the man who stopped them.

— Harold Meeks, Inwood, Manhattan

To the Editor:

I appreciate that the Bugle prints dissenting views, including mine. I share Mr. Jameson's unease. Whatever this figure's intentions, a city cannot function on faith in a stranger's good judgment. I hope the council's ordinance passes.

— Eleanor Voss, Riverdale, Bronx

To the Editor:

My daughter's stroller rolled into traffic on Amsterdam Avenue last Tuesday. A man in red and blue caught it before I could even scream. I did not get his name. I would like this paper to print, just once, a simple thank you on my behalf.

— Name withheld, Upper West Side

Back to top