Skip to main content

A Practice in Subtraction

A studio piece, in a medium of your choosing, built around one deliberate and defensible omission

Due: 30 April 2027 · Weight: 35%

The brief

Make one finished piece — writing, image, sound, video, code, a proof, a design, anything with a defined medium — built around a single omission you chose on purpose. Submit the piece and a written defence of at least 300 words: what you left out, why it was harder to cut than to keep, and what the piece would have lost by keeping it.

Submission format

The piece itself, in whatever format its medium requires, plus the defence as a separate Markdown or PDF file. If the piece is time-based (audio, video, animation), keep it under three minutes: the mark is for the cut, not the runtime.

What this is testing

Whether the semester’s reading translates into your own practice, not just your ability to describe someone else’s cut after the fact. The defence is marked as strictly as the piece — a strong piece with a weak defence, or a weak piece with a defence that argues its way around the work rather than through it, both mark down.

The spec

The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.

How it is marked

CriterionWeight
Execution40%
Defence35%
Response to feedback25%