A Practice in Subtraction
A studio piece, in a medium of your choosing, built around one deliberate and defensible omission
Due: 30 April 2027 · Weight: 35%
The brief#
Make one finished piece — writing, image, sound, video, code, a proof, a design, anything with a defined medium — built around a single omission you chose on purpose. Submit the piece and a written defence of at least 300 words: what you left out, why it was harder to cut than to keep, and what the piece would have lost by keeping it.
Submission format#
The piece itself, in whatever format its medium requires, plus the defence as a separate Markdown or PDF file. If the piece is time-based (audio, video, animation), keep it under three minutes: the mark is for the cut, not the runtime.
What this is testing#
Whether the semester’s reading translates into your own practice, not just your ability to describe someone else’s cut after the fact. The defence is marked as strictly as the piece — a strong piece with a weak defence, or a weak piece with a defence that argues its way around the work rather than through it, both mark down.
The spec
The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.
- a finished piece in one medium, plus a written defence of at least 300 words
- the defence names the specific thing left out and argues why leaving it out was the harder, better decision than including it
How it is marked
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Execution | 40% |
| Defence | 35% |
| Response to feedback | 25% |