Week 7 Lab: After the Manifesto
The fundamentalist split the 1890 Manifesto itself produced, and the road to Short Creek and the FLDS
5 April 2027
Before the lab#
Read about the 1890s–1930s fundamentalist movement: the people who read the Manifesto as a political concession rather than a doctrinal reversal, and kept practicing plural marriage regardless.
In the lab#
This schism has no dead founder. The fundamentalist movement splits from the mainstream church over a doctrine the mainstream church itself changed — continuationism, the claim that a valid revelation stays binding even after the church publicly reverses its position. We trace this to Short Creek (later Colorado City/Hildale) and the FLDS church, still operating today.
Afterwards#
Hold this case next to week 4’s Strangites: one collapsed at its founder’s death, the other has now outlasted the church it split from by over a century.
The spec
What you bring to the lab. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you can explain why the fundamentalist movement's pivot is continuationism rather than a founder's death, and how that makes it a different shape of schism than weeks 2–5's
Teaching team
- Marisol Quaye — convenor