Week 8 Lab: Inpainting seams lab
A lab spent generating and then deliberately hunting for the seams in inpainted images, cataloguing which tells actually generalise
22 April 2027
Before the lab#
Bring three or four source images you’re comfortable editing and sharing with the group — photos of places or objects work better than photos of people for this exercise, and are simpler to get consent-free.
In the lab#
Mask a region of each image — a hand, a background object, a section of sky — and generate a fill. Then swap images with another pair and try to find the mask boundary without being told where it was. Some fills are genuinely undetectable at a glance; the interesting data is in which ones are, and which categories of region resist detection versus which give themselves away every time.
Second pass: zoom in. A flaw invisible at thumbnail size is often obvious at full resolution, which is itself worth noting — most of these images are viewed at thumbnail size in the wild.
Afterwards#
Your category list — the recurring types of tell, not the individual images — is the useful artefact here. Individual examples date quickly as the tools improve; a mechanism (“boundaries where a repeating pattern meets a non-repeating one”) tends to stay useful longer.
The spec
What you bring to the session. Written so a reader can tell whether it has been met without asking you.
- you have generated at least six inpainted images using a masked region of your choosing
- you have identified a visible flaw in at least two of them and can point to its exact location
- your write-up sorts your flaws into categories rather than listing them individually
Teaching team
- Priya Nandakumar — convenor