Skip to main content

A1 — Explain It Without the Explainer

Learn something unfamiliar, close every source, reconstruct it from memory, then test the reconstruction against the authority you closed.

Due: 29 March 2027 · Weight: 30%

The brief

Pick something you don’t yet understand, learn it with the source open, then find out what you actually kept once it closed.

This is a self-measurement task, not a research report. Choose material narrow enough to reconstruct in full inside the time you have — a mechanism, a procedure, an argument — and unfamiliar enough that you can’t already recite it. Read or watch with the source open, close it, and write your explanation from memory alone. Then reopen the source and mark your own reconstruction against it, in public, in the submission itself.

The mark isn’t for getting it right the first time. It’s for locating, precisely, where the reconstruction diverged from the source, and for the corrected explanation you produce once you’ve seen the gap.

What you submit

A single document with three parts: the reconstruction (written with the source closed, timestamped or otherwise evidenced as such), the comparison against the reopened source, and the corrected explanation. Note what your instrument — this exercise — could and couldn’t tell you about whether you understood the material, as distinct from whether you remembered it.

The spec

The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.

How it is marked

CriterionWeight
Reconstruction accuracy against the closed source40%
Candour about the weak spot30%
Quality of the corrected model30%