Skip to main content

The Chain

Investigate one artefact through ten documented copying steps, and report what each step changed in measurements someone else could reproduce.

Due: 26 March 2027 ยท Weight: 20%

Choose a copying process. Put one artefact through ten documented steps of it, and report what each step changed.

Due 12:00, Friday 26 March 2027 (Canberra time). About 8โ€“10 hours.

What you submit

The original and ten outputs, a settings log, a measurement table, the prediction you recorded before you started, and a 600-word analysis.

Keep the original. Include a control that isolates something your measurement might otherwise be blamed on. A finding of no measurable change is a valid result and is marked as one โ€” the exact-copy control in week 1 exists to make that point early.

You may use a process demonstrated in a workshop, provided you pose your own comparison. You are not required to invent a new technology or acquire equipment, and no premium is awarded for expensive apparatus or dramatic degradation.

The prediction

Record what you expect to lose before you run anything. The mark rewards comparing that expectation honestly with what happened. A prediction quietly revised after seeing the result scores nothing on that criterion.

Extensions, late work and declaration of tools: see the course policies.

The spec

The brief poses the problem and leaves room for a response. The spec is the fixed part: what a marker checks. Some lines can be checked mechanically; the rest call for judgement.

How it is marked

CriterionWeight
Reproducibility35%
Measurement and controls30%
Evidence interpretation25%
Prediction and reflection10%