Skip to main content

Week 4: The Story Is Lying

Controlling what a reader believes, and making sure they can find the clues once they know better.

A reader normally trusts a story to give them enough truthful information to work out what’s happening. Week 4 asks what happens once that trust becomes something the storyteller can use — not to trick the reader for its own sake, but to control what they believe until they have reason to reconsider it.

There are five tools for this:

The most important test for any of this is fairness on rereading. After a reveal, a reader should be able to go back to the earlier pages and find the clue was actually there — misread, overlooked, or understood differently the first time. A reveal that depends on information appearing from nowhere isn’t misdirection, it’s just withholding with no payoff.

There’s a weak version of this idea and a stronger one. Weak: the reader couldn’t possibly have known, because the information wasn’t there. Strong: the reader saw the information and interpreted it differently. Aim for the second — confusing a reader is not the same as controlling what they believe.

Today’s studio, Read Me Twice, asks you to build a four-page story that reads one way the first time and differently the second, with the clue for the second reading sitting in plain sight from the start.